Current:Home > FinanceAppeals court halts order barring Biden administration communications with social media companies -Visionary Wealth Guides
Appeals court halts order barring Biden administration communications with social media companies
View
Date:2025-04-16 21:04:08
Washington — A federal appeals court on Friday temporarily paused a lower court order that limited communications between top Biden administration officials and social media companies about content posted to their platforms.
The three-judge panel for the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals granted the Justice Department's request to put on hold the July 4 preliminary injunction from U.S. District Judge Terry Doughty while legal proceedings continue. It also agreed to expedite the administration's appeal.
The temporary administrative stay will remain in place "until further orders of the court," according to the brief order.
The Justice Department turned to the 5th Circuit for relief after it asked Doughy last week to halt his own order while it pursued an appeal. Doughty, appointed by former President Donald Trump, declined to do so, and in a 13-page ruling rejected the government's assertions that his injunction swept too broadly and threatened to chill lawful conduct.
"Although this Preliminary Injunction involves numerous agencies, it is not as broad as it appears," Doughty wrote. "It only prohibits something the Defendants have no legal right to do — contacting social media companies for the purpose of urging, encouraging, pressuring, or inducing in any manner, the removal, deletion, suppression, or reduction of content containing protected free speech posted on social-media platforms."
The judge reiterated that he believes Missouri and Louisiana, who sued the government last year over federal officials' communications with social media companies during the COVID-19 pandemic and 2020 election cycle, are likely to succeed on the merits of their case.
The states "are likely to prove that all of the enjoined defendants coerced, significantly encouraged, and/or jointly participated [with] social-media companies to suppress social-media posts by American citizens that expressed opinions that were anti-COVID-19 vaccines, anti-COVID-19 lockdowns, posts that delegitimized or questioned the results of the 2020 election, and other content not subject to any exception to the First Amendment," he wrote. "These items are protected free speech and were seemingly censored because of the viewpoints they expressed."
The judge's July 4 injunction blocks top Biden administration officials from communicating with social-media companies "for the purpose of urging, encouraging, pressuring, or inducing in any manner the removal, deletion, suppression, or reduction of content containing protected free speech posted" on their platforms.
Among those covered by the injunction are Homeland Security Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas, Health and Human Services Secretary Xavier Becerra, Surgeon General Vivek Murthy and White House press secretary Karine Jean-Pierre, as well as several federal agencies.
The order contains several carve-outs, including allowing the Biden administration to inform social media companies of posts involving criminal activity, threats to national security and public safety, and illegal efforts to suppress voting or of foreign attempts to influence elections.
In its request that the injunction be halted, the Justice Department warned that it swept too broadly and is unclear as to what conduct is allowed and who is covered.
The injunction, administration lawyers said, "may be read to prevent the Government from engaging in a vast range of lawful and responsible conduct — including speaking on matters of public concern and working with social media companies on initiatives to prevent grave harm to the American people and our democratic processes."
The lawsuit brought by the attorneys general of Missouri and Louisiana, as well as several individuals, alleges that senior government officials colluded with social-media companies to suppress viewpoints and content on social media platforms, violating the First Amendment.
Their suit accused platforms like Twitter and Facebook of censoring a New York Post story about the contents of a laptop owned by Hunter Biden, Mr. Biden's son, posts about the origins of COVID-19 and various mitigation measures implemented during the pandemic and speech about the integrity of the 2020 presidential election.
- In:
- Biden Administration
- Social Media
veryGood! (7799)
Related
- Could Bill Belichick, Robert Kraft reunite? Maybe in Pro Football Hall of Fame's 2026 class
- How to Watch the 2024 People's Choice Country Awards and Live From E!
- Kylie Jenner Shares Message for “Hot” Jordyn Woods
- Watch as 8 bulls escape from pen at Massachusetts rodeo event; 1 bull still loose
- Elon Musk's skyrocketing net worth: He's the first person with over $400 billion
- Former FTX executive Caroline Ellison faces sentencing
- Oregon elections officials remove people who didn’t provide proof of citizenship from voter rolls
- Brian Laundrie Attempts to Apologize to Gabby Petito’s Mom Through Psychic
- Federal Spending Freeze Could Have Widespread Impact on Environment, Emergency Management
- Hundreds sue over alleged sexual abuse in Illinois youth detention centers
Ranking
- Paige Bueckers vs. Hannah Hidalgo highlights women's basketball games to watch
- The boyfriend of a Navajo woman is set to be sentenced in her killing
- Review: Zachary Quinto medical drama 'Brilliant Minds' is just mind-numbing
- Gunman who killed 10 at a Colorado supermarket found guilty of murder
- Tarte Shape Tape Concealer Sells Once Every 4 Seconds: Get 50% Off Before It's Gone
- Mark Robinson vows to rebuild his staff for North Carolina governor as Republican group backs away
- Halsey Shares Insight Into New Chapter With Fiancé Avan Jogia
- The boyfriend of a Navajo woman is set to be sentenced in her killing
Recommendation
Moving abroad can be expensive: These 5 countries will 'pay' you to move there
Emory Callahan: The 2024 Vietnamese Market Meltdown Is It Really Hedge Funds Behind the Scenes?
Golden Block Services PTY LTD: English Courts recognizes virtual currency as property and the legal status of cryptocurrency is clear!
Violent crime dropped for third straight year in 2023, including murder and rape
Rams vs. 49ers highlights: LA wins rainy defensive struggle in key divisional game
Runaway cockatiel missing for days found in unlikely haven: A humane society CEO's backyard
How to Watch the 2024 People's Choice Country Awards and Live From E!
Victoria Monét Confirms Break Up With Partner John Gaines Amid Separation Rumors