Current:Home > InvestJudge strikes down Biden administration program shielding immigrant spouses from deportation -Visionary Wealth Guides
Judge strikes down Biden administration program shielding immigrant spouses from deportation
View
Date:2025-04-17 23:54:14
A federal judge on Thursday struck down a Biden administration policy that aimed to ease a path to citizenship for some undocumented immigrants who are married to U.S. citizens.
The program, lauded as one of the biggest presidential actions to help immigrant families in years, allowed undocumented spouses and stepchildren of U.S. citizens to apply for a green card without first having to leave the country.
The temporary relief from deportation brought a brief sense of security to some 500,000 immigrants estimated to benefit from the program before Texas-based U.S. District Judge J. Campbell Barker put it on hold in August, days after applicants filed their paperwork.
Barker ruled Thursday that the Biden administration had overstepped its authority by implementing the program and had stretched the legal interpretation of relevant immigration law “past its breaking point.”
The short-lived Biden administration initiative known as “Keeping Families Together” would have been unlikely to remain in place after Donald Trump took office in January. But its early termination creates greater uncertainty for immigrant families as many are bracing for Trump’s return to the White House.
Trump’s election victory this week sets the stage for a swift crackdown on undocumented individuals after the Republican ran on promises of “mass deportation.” The president-elect energized his supporters on the campaign trail with a litany anti-immigrant statements, including that immigrants were “poisoning the blood” of the nation.
During his first term, Trump appointed Barker as a judge in Tyler, Texas, which lies in the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, a favored venue for advocates pushing conservative arguments.
Barker had placed the immigration initiative on hold after Texas and 15 other states, led by their Republican attorneys general, filed a legal challenge accusing the executive branch of bypassing Congress to help immigrant families for “blatant political purposes.”
Republicans argued the initiative created costs for their states and could draw more migrants to the U.S.
The policy would have applied to people who have been living continuously in the U.S. for at least 10 years, do not pose a security threat and have utilized the existing legal authority known as “parole in place” that offers deportation protections.
Those married to a citizen by June 17, the day before the program was announced, could pay a $580 application fee and fill out a lengthy application explaining why they deserve humanitarian parole. If approved, applicants would have three years to seek permanent residency and obtain work authorization.
It was not immediately clear Thursday whether anyone had received approval under the program, which only accepted applications for about a week before the federal judge placed it on hold.
Noncitizen spouses are already eligible for legal status but often have to apply from their home countries. The process typically includes a years-long wait outside of the U.S., which can separate family members with different immigration statuses.
veryGood! (34)
Related
- Hackers hit Rhode Island benefits system in major cyberattack. Personal data could be released soon
- How Las Vegas, once known as Sin City, became an unlikely sports haven
- Caitlin Clark points tracker: See how close Iowa women's basketball star is to NCAA record
- Nebraska upsets No. 2 Iowa: Caitlin Clark 8 points from scoring record
- Man can't find second winning lottery ticket, sues over $394 million jackpot, lawsuit says
- Score a Look at 49ers Player Kyle Juszczyk and Wife Kristin Juszczyk’s Stylish Romance
- Inside Janet Jackson's Infamous Super Bowl Wardrobe Malfunction and Its Even More Complicated Aftermath
- Ariana Grande and Cynthia Erivo Defy Gravity in Wicked Trailer Released During Super Bowl 2024
- See you latte: Starbucks plans to cut 30% of its menu
- Super Bowl 58 bold predictions: Six strong claims for Chiefs vs. 49ers
Ranking
- A White House order claims to end 'censorship.' What does that mean?
- Sophie Turner and Peregrine Pearson Make Public Debut as a Couple
- Maryland man becomes second winner of $5 million from 50 Years scratch-off game
- Who sang the national anthem at the 2024 Super Bowl? All about Reba McEntire
- Federal appeals court upholds $14.25 million fine against Exxon for pollution in Texas
- 'Jeopardy!' boss really wants Emma Stone to keep trying to get on the show
- Greening Mardi Gras: Environmentalists push alternatives to plastic Carnival beads in New Orleans
- High profile women stand out on the 2024 Rock & Roll Hall of Fame shortlist
Recommendation
Paula Abdul settles lawsuit with former 'So You Think You Can Dance' co
'Game manager'? Tired label means Super Bowl double standard for Brock Purdy, Patrick Mahomes
Who is Harrison Butker? Everything to know about Chiefs kicker before Super Bowl 58
Fans turned away, alcohol sales halted at Phoenix Open as TPC Scottsdale reaches capacity
The Daily Money: Spending more on holiday travel?
Even for Las Vegas, the Super Bowl is a huge deal: 'I've never really seen it this busy'
Lizzo Debuts Good as Hell New Hairstyle at Super Bowl 2024
The S&P 500 hit a new record. Why the milestone does (and does not) matter for your 401(k)