Current:Home > reviewsKansas won’t force providers to ask patients why they want abortions while a lawsuit proceeds -Visionary Wealth Guides
Kansas won’t force providers to ask patients why they want abortions while a lawsuit proceeds
Chainkeen Exchange View
Date:2025-04-06 13:54:03
TOPEKA, Kan. (AP) — Kansas isn’t enforcing a new law requiring abortion providers to ask patients why they want to terminate their pregnancies, as a legal challenge against that rule and other older requirements makes its way through the courts.
Attorneys for the state and for providers challenging the new law along with other requirements announced a deal Thursday. In return for not enforcing the law, the state will get another four months to develop its defense of the challenged restrictions ahead of a trial now delayed until late June 2025. The agreement was announced during a Zoom hearing in Johnson County District Court in the Kansas City area.
Kansas doesn’t ban most abortions until the 22nd week of pregnancy. Its clinics now see thousands of patients from other states with near bans on abortion, most notably Missouri, Oklahoma and Texas.
Last fall, District Judge K. Christopher Jayaram blocked enforcement of requirements that include rules spelling out what providers must tell their patients, and a longstanding requirement that patients wait 24 hours after consulting a provider to undergo a procedure. On July 1, he allowed the providers to add a challenge to the new reporting law to their existing lawsuit rather than making them file a separate case.
The new law was supposed to take effect July 1 and would require providers to ask patients questions from a state script about their reasons for an abortion, although patients wouldn’t be forced to answer. Potential reasons include not being able to afford a child, not wanting a disabled child, not wanting to put schooling or a career on hold, and having an abusive spouse or partner. Clinics would be required to send data about patients’ answers to the state health department for a public report every six months.
“We are relieved that this intrusive law will not take effect,” the Center for Reproductive Rights, the national organization for abortion provider Planned Parenthood and the regional Planned Parenthood affiliate said in a joint statement. “This law would have forced abortion providers to collect deeply personal information — an unjustifiable invasion of patient privacy that has nothing to do with people’s health.”
Kansas already collects data about each abortion, such as the method and the week of pregnancy, but abortion opponents argue that having more information will aid in setting policies for helping pregnant women and new mothers. The Republican-controlled Legislature enacted the law over a veto from Democratic Gov. Laura Kelly.
At least eight other states have such reporting requirements, but the Kansas Supreme Court declared in 2019 that the state constitution protects access to abortion as a part of a “fundamental” right to bodily autonomy. In August 2022, Kansas voters decisively rejected a proposed amendment to say that the constitution doesn’t grant any right to abortion access.
The trial of the providers’ lawsuit had been set for late February 2025 before Jayaram delayed it in responded to the parties’ deal.
“The state is prepared to accept an agreement not to enforce the new law until the final judgment, provided that we get a schedule that accommodates the record that we think we need to develop in this case,” said Lincoln Wilson, a senior counsel for the anti-abortion Alliance Defending Freedom, which is leading the state’s defense of its laws.
Abortion providers suggested July 1 that the state wouldn’t enforce the new reporting requirement while the lawsuit proceeded, but the health department did not confirm that when reporters asked about it.
veryGood! (55)
Related
- A South Texas lawmaker’s 15
- Are we in a recession? The Sahm rule explained
- After a Study Found Lead in Tampons, Environmentalists Wonder if Global Metal Pollution Is Worse Than They Previously Thought
- Steve McMichael, battling ALS, inducted into Hall of Fame in ceremony from home
- Jamie Foxx gets stitches after a glass is thrown at him during dinner in Beverly Hills
- US men's soccer loss in Olympic knockout stage really shows where team is at right now
- Millie Bobby Brown Shares Sweet Glimpse Into Married Life With Jake Bongiovi
- Aerosmith retires from touring, citing permanent damage to Steven Tyler’s voice last year
- Elon Musk's skyrocketing net worth: He's the first person with over $400 billion
- Ryan Crouser achieves historic Olympic three-peat in shot put
Ranking
- McConnell absent from Senate on Thursday as he recovers from fall in Capitol
- 'Terror took over': Mexican survivors of US shooting share letters 5 years on
- IBA says it will award prize money to Italian boxer amid gender controversy at Olympics
- Police search huge NYC migrant shelter for ‘dangerous contraband’ as residents wait in summer heat
- San Francisco names street for Associated Press photographer who captured the iconic Iwo Jima photo
- Inside Gymnast Olivia Dunne and MLB Star Paul Skenes’ Winning Romance
- Mariah Carey is taking her Christmas music on tour again! See star's 2024 dates
- Here’s Why Blake Lively Doesn’t Use Conditioner—And How Her Blake Brown Products Can Give You Iconic Hair
Recommendation
A South Texas lawmaker’s 15
Class is in Session at Nordstrom Rack's 2024 Back-to-College Sale: Score Huge Savings Up to 85% Off
Katie Ledecky makes Olympic history again, winning 800m freestyle gold for fourth time
The 'Tribal Chief' is back: Roman Reigns returns to WWE at SummerSlam, spears Solo Sikoa
Highlights from Trump’s interview with Time magazine
Why M. Night Shyamalan's killer thriller 'Trap' is really a dad movie
Taking Over from the Inside: China’s Growing Reach Into Local Waters
Are we in a recession? The Sahm rule explained